22 Oct Writer 504 Same Focus as the practicum Time to ant
Writer 504 Same Focus as the practicum Time to antibiotic for Community Acquired Pneumonia Please feel free to go into the classroom. I gave you all access information of the first practicum order. Thank you for all your hard work and excellent writing I will have some attachments as well that will hopefully make more sense of these next 4 orders. These three task will be entered into one paper. This is All Due by October 25 Assignment: Capstone Paper: Introduction By Day 7 In each week of this course you will apply the steps of the quality improvement process to a real practice problem. This Capstone Paper will provide the comprehensive discussion of your Practicum Project. The paper will be submitted in steps so the faculty can approve each section. Each section should be added to the previous section so that by Week 6 the faculty has read and made recommendations for the final paper. You are expected to incorporate the feedback you receive after each submission and before submitting the next assignment To prepare for this Assignment: • Review the Capstone Paper Assignment Guide • Download the template you will use to complete this Assignment o Walden University. Walden templates: General templates: APA course paper template with advice (6th ed.). Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-2774360 o Review the webinar on using a template. Delete the abstract page in the template. This is not required for this course. The template includes the correct font and formatting: 12 pt. Times New Roman font, double spacing, and 1 inch margins on all sides. • Review the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist Capstone Level o Note the new expectations for Use of evidence and Credit to Source o Use a Scholarly Voice http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/scholarlywriting#s-lg-box-2773859 o Review the Walden University Writing Center webpage: Using Evidence: Synthesis • Review the Week 3 Assignment Rubric • Identify a quality improvement practice problem to be discussed in the Capstone paper o Consider problems related to structure, process, outcomes, or patient experience. Remember: Each section of the Capstone Paper must meet the Academic Writing Expectations for the Capstone Level. For this Assignment, write a 1-2 paragraphs that address the following: • Practice Problem o State the practice problem in measurable terms and that reflect quality indicators. This is the same problem described in the week 1 practicum discussion. Keep in mind that this section may need to be revised after you complete all of the other sections. o Provide the rationale for selecting the practice problem. See Chapter 3, page 65, Exhibit 3.16 in the Spath (2013) text for examples. By Day 7 of Week 3, submit this Assignment, along with the Capstone Paper sections introduced in Week 2 and Week 3. Week 2 Assignment: Capstone Paper: Literature Review By Day 7 Complete a literature review for your practice problem. Summarize the purpose, methods, and findings for each of the studies located in your literature review. A minimum of five peer-reviewed, evidence-based practice articles. Include an explanation of the quality management measurement and data that were presented (4–5 paragraphs). That is, explain to what extent the solution influenced the practice problem. Use appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding and shaping the whole work. Submission and Grading Information To prepare for this Assignment: • Review the Capstone Paper Assignment Guide • Locate the most current version of your Week 1 Assignment. You will add this section to that document. • Review the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist Capstone Level o Note the new expectations for Use of evidence and Credit to Source o Use a Scholarly Voice http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/scholarlywriting#s-lg-box-2773859 o Review the Walden University Writing Center webpage: Using Evidence: Synthesis • Review the Week 3 Assignment Rubric Remember: Each section of the Capstone Paper must meet the Academic Writing Expectations for the Capstone Level. For this Assignment, write 4-5 paragraphs that address the following: • Literature Review o Synthesize the purpose, methods, and findings from at least five peer-reviewed, evidence-based practice articles that support your practice problem. Two main components of successful synthesis include evidence of the student’s own ideas and a well-organized presentation of evidence. o Include an explanation of the quality management measurement and data that were presented. o Include a minimum of at least 5 peer-reviewed evidence-based practice articles that support your practice problem. By Day 7 of Week 3, submit this Assignment, along with the Capstone Paper sections introduced in Week 1 and Week 3. ________________________________________ Week in Review Week 3 Assignment: Capstone Paper: Introduction, Literature Review, and Quality Improvement Process The Assignment you will submit this week will combine the work you completed in Week 1 (Introduction) and Week 2 (Literature Review). This week, you will integrate the Quality Improvement Process details in approximately 2-3 paragraphs for your Capstone Paper. To prepare for this Assignment: • Review the Capstone Paper Assignment Guide • Locate the most current version of your Week 1 and Week 2 Assignment. You will add this section to that document. • Review the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist Capstone Level o Note the new expectations for Use of evidence and Credit to Source o Use a Scholarly Voice http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/scholarlywriting#s-lg-box-2773859 o Review the Walden University Writing Center webpage: Using Evidence: Synthesis • Review the Week 3 Assignment Rubric Remember: Each section of the Capstone Paper must meet the Academic Writing Expectations for the Capstone Level. For this Assignment, write 2-3 paragraphs that address the following: • Describe the quality improvement process and the tool that will be used as a basis for the practice problem. • Explain why the specific process was selected and document your explanation with references. For this Assignment, you will submit a 7-10 paragraph paper that addresses the following: • Practice Problem (Completed in Week 1) (Approximately 1-2 paragraphs) o State the practice problem in measurable terms. (Keep in mind that this section may need to be revised after you complete all of the other sections.) • Purpose, Methods, and Findings (Completed in Week 2) (Approximately 4-5 paragraphs). o Synthesize the purpose, methods and findings from the literature that support your practice problem. (Two main components of successful synthesis include evidence of the student’s own ideas and a well-organized presentation of evidence.) o Include minimum of at least 5 peer-reviewed evidence-based practice articles that support your practice problem. • Quality Improvement Process (Completed this Week) (Approximately 2-3 paragraphs) o Describe the quality improvement process and the tool that will be used as a basis for the practice problem. o Explain why the specific process was selected and document your explanation with references. By Day 7 Submit your Assignment. Submission and Grading Information Naming Convention for Saving Your Assignment • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. Review the Rubric • Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment. To access your rubric: Week 3 Assignment Rubric Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity Before you submit your final assignment for grading, submit it to Safe Assign in the Week 3 Draft area of the course. To check your Assignment draft for authenticity: Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report. Revise Assignment Based on Safe Assign Originality Report • Click here http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ASCtii/ASCtiioriginality to learn how to interpret your originality score. • Use the information provided in the Originality Report to revise your assignment. Paraphrasing and citing your sources in-text will decrease the similarity score. • Submit Your Completed Assignment for Grading: o From the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. o If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database. o Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_4220_Week3_Assignment_Rubric • Grid View • List View Excellent Proficient Basic Needs Improvement Identified the quality improvement problem 9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%) Provided provided a fully developed quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%) Provided provided a developed a quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%) Provided provided a minimally-developed quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 0 (0%) – 6 (4%) Provided provided an under-developed quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Stated in measureable terms that reflect quality indicators. 9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%) Provided provided a fully developed problem stated in measureable terms that reflects quality indicators with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%) Provided provided a developed a quality improvement problem stated in measureable terms with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%) Provided provided a minimally-developed quality improvement problem stated in measureable terms with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 0 (0%) – 6 (4%) Provided provided an under-developed quality improvement problem that was not stated in measureable with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Provided the rationale for selecting the practice problem including the importance in improving patient outcomes. 18 (12%) – 20 (13.33%) Provided provided a fully developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 16 (10.67%) – 17 (11.33%) Provided provided a developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%) Provided provided a minimally-developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 0 (0%) – 13 (8.67%) Provided provided an under-developed rationale for the quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Synthesized the purpose, methods and findings from the literature that support the practice problem. 36 (24%) – 40 (26.67%) Provided provided a fully developed synthesis of the purpose, methods and findings from the literature with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 32 (21.33%) – 35 (23.33%) Provided provided a developed synthesis of the purpose, methods and findings from the literature with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 28 (18.67%) – 31 (20.67%) Provided provided a minimally-developed s ynthesis of the purpose, methods and findings from the literature with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 0 (0%) – 27 (18%) Provided provided an under-developed synthesis of the purpose, methods and findings from the literature with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Applied a quality improvement process to the practice problem. 14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%) Provided provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 12 (8%) – 13 (8.67%) Provided provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 11 (7.33%) – 11 (7.33%) Provided provided a minimally-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 0 (0%) – 10 (6.67%) Provided provided an under developed discussion of the selected quality improvement process with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Chose a specific quality improvement tool that will be used throughout the project.New Row6 23 (15.33%) – 25 (16.67%) Provided provided a fully developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 20 (13.33%) – 22 (14.67%) Provided provided a developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 18 (12%) – 19 (12.67%) Provided provided a minimally-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 0 (0%) – 17 (11.33%) Provided provided an under-developed discussion of the selected quality improvement tool with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Academic Writing Expectations (AWE 4) Capstone Level 14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%) Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through fully developed use of evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the 4000 Capstone level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. 12 (8%) – 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through developed use of evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 4000 Capstone level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. 11 (7.33%) – 11 (7.33%) Demonstrates minimally developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Beginning to display academic expression through minimally developed use of evidence from some sources to support content. Minimally meets the 4000 Capstone level with several writing issues and meets the minimum reference requirement. 0 (0%) – 10 (6.67%) Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Does not display academic expression, has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the content. Does not meet the 4000 Capstone level of writing and does not meet the minimum reference requirement. APA 14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%) Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with no formatting errors. 12 (8%) – 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with minimal formatting errors. 11 (7.33%) – 11 (7.33%) Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with several formatting errors. 0 (0%) – 10 (6.67%) Demonstrates limited APA formatting and referencing requirements with multiple formatting errors. Total Points: 150 Name: NURS_4220_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Wridemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.