05 Jun Week 1: CGE Project Introduction (graded)11 unread reply.11 reply
Week 1: CGE Project Introduction (graded)11 unread reply.11 reply.This course will focus on approaching your CGE project topic from a project management perspective. We will spend a majority of this course laying the critical planning foundation. Feedback from your colleagues and peers should be a routine practice when it comes to projects. For this discussion, please address the following.State your PICOT either as a post or an attachment to the Week 1 PICOT worksheet.Provide a brief overview of your project and how you came to choose this project.Read through the posts of your classmates and provide constructive feedback. Ask any questions you may have about a classmate’s topic or share any experience you have in that area. Remember to always be respectful and encouraging when it comes to providing feedback. Threaded Discussion Grading RubricParticipation for MSNThreaded Discussion Guiding PrinciplesThe ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.Participation GuidelinesEach weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. Posting twice on two different days meets the minimum requirement however for full credit, the student must post at least three substantive posts on three different days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. Week 8 only– Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Saturday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 8.Direct Quotes Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category. Grading Rubric Guidelines Point ValuesExceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceExceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performanceMeets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceNeeds Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performanceDeveloping(0)Unsatisfactory level of performancePerformance Category109840ScholarlinessDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. · Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. · Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. · Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. · Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. · Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. · Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion. · Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. · Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. · Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. · Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic. · Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. · Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. · The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.· No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. · Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.Performance Category109840Application of Course Knowledge –Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations · Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; · Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.· Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. · Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life · Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content· Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. · Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life · Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson · Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. · Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content · Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life · Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored · No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life Performance Category54320Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) · Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. · A minimum of three posts in each graded thread, over three separate days. · Replies to a post from a peer and faculty member’s question. A response to faculty could include a question posed to a specific student or the entire class. · Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.· Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days · Replies to a question or post by a peer but not to a faculty post · Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. The summary could be included in one of the three minimum posts.· Makes two posts on 2 different days · Does not reply to a question or post by a peer · Makes limited, if any, connections, and those are often cast in the form of vague generalities.· Has only one post for the week or posts twice on the same day. · Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments· Does not post to the thread · No connections are made to the topic Minus 1 PointMinus 2 PointsMinus 3 PointsMinus 4 PointsMinus 5 PointsGrammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual Current Edition· 2-3 errors in APA format. · Written responseshave 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. · Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication. · 4-5 errors in APA format. · Writing responseshave 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. · Writing style is somewhat focused.· 6-7 errors in APA format. · Writing responseshave 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. · Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.· 8-10 errors in APA format. · Writing responseshave 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. · Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.· Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. · Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. · Writing style does not facilitate communication. · The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor 0 points lost -5 points lost Total Participation Requirementsper discussion threadThe student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different daysEarly Participation Requirementper discussion threadThe student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday of the eighth week.*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Wridemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.