12 Sep QuestionPrepare this assignment as a 1600 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assign
Posted at 09:45h
in Uncategorized
Prepare this assignment as a 1600 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Question
Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.
The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.
Refer to "Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft." Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.
General Requirements
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| NRS-433V | NRS-433V-O501 | PICOT Question and Literature Search | 120.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) | 4: Good (94.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 80.0% | ||||||||
| Summary of Clinical Issue | 5.0% | A clinical issue is omitted or is not relevant to nursing practice. | A clinical issue is partially presented. It is unclear how the clinical issue relates to nursing practice. Significant aspects are missing, or there are inaccuracies. | A clinical issue is summarized. The issue generally relates to nursing practice. | A clinical issue is presented. The issue relates to nursing practice. Minor detail is needed for clarity. | A clinical issue is thoroughly described. The issue relates to nursing practice. | 6.00/6.00 | ||
| PICOT Question | 10.0% | A PICOT question is not included. | A PICOT question is provided but is incomplete. The PICOT question format is used incorrectly. | A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is generally applied. Some information or revision is needed. | A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is applied accurately. Some detail is need for support or clarity. | A PICOT question is clearly presented. The PICOT question format is applied accurately and presents an answerable and researchable question. | 12.00/12.00 | ||
| APA-Formatted Article Citations With Permalinks | 5.0% | Article citations and permalinks are omitted. | Article citations and permalinks are presented. There are significant errors in the APA format. One or more links do not lead to the intended article. | Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format, but there are errors. | Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format. There are minor errors. | Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurately presented in APA format. | 6.00/6.00 | ||
| Relationship of Articles to the PICOT Question | 10.0% | Three or more articles do not relate to the PICOT question. | At least two articles do not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide a small degree of support for the PICOT question. Different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question. | At least one articles does not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide general support for the PICOT question. One or two different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question. | Each article relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide support for the PICOT question. | Each article clearly relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide strong support for the PICOT question. | 12.00/12.00 | ||
| Quantitative and Qualitative Articles | 10.0% | Fewer than six research articles are presented. Four or more articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, | Six research articles are presented. Three articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative | Six research articles are presented. Two articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. Some ability to identify the type of research design used in a study is demonstrated. | Six research articles are presented. One article does not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. A general ability to identify the type of research design used in a study is demonstrated. | Six research articles are presented. Each article meets the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. An ability to identify the different types of research design used in a study is consistently demonstrated. | 12.00/12.00 | ||
| Purpose Statements | 5.0% | Purpose statements are omitted or are incomplete overall. | Purpose statements are referenced but are incomplete in some areas. | Purpose statements are presented. There are minor omissions in some areas, or major inaccuracies. | Purpose statements summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies in some. | Purpose statements are accurate and clearly summarized. | 4.50/6.00 | ||
| Research Questions | 5.0% | Research questions are omitted or are incomplete overall. | Research question is presented for each article. The research question has been misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research question for several of the articles. | Research questions are presented. The research question has been misidentified or misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the research question for one or two articles. | Research questions are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some areas. | Research questions are accurate and capture the fundamental question posed by the researchers in each study. | 4.50/6.00 | ||
| Outcome | 5.0% | Research outcomes are omitted or are incomplete overall. | Research outcome is presented for each article. The research outcome has been misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for several of the articles. | Research outcomes are presented. The research outcome has been misidentified or misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for one or two articles. | Research outcomes are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some areas. | Research outcomes are accurate and described in detail for each article. | 5.64/6.00 | ||
| Setting | 5.0% | The setting is omitted for one or more of the articles. The setting described for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. | The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. | The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. | The setting is indicated for each article. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the physical, social, or cultural site in which the researcher conducted the study. | The setting in which the researcher conducted the study is detailed and accurate for each article. | 5.64/6.00 | ||
| Sample | 5.0% | The sample is omitted for one or more of the articles. The sample described for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. | The sample is indicated for each article. The sample described for at least two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. | The sample is indicated for each article. The sample described for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. | The sample is indicated for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. | The sample is indicated and accurate for each article. | 5.64/6.00 | ||
| Method | 5.0% | Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of study are incomplete. | The method of study is partially presented for each article. Key information is consistently omitted. Overall, the methods reported contain inaccuracies. | The method of study for each article is presented. Some key aspects are missing for one or two articles, or there are some inaccuracies for the methods reported. | A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. | A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. | 5.64/6.00 | ||
| Key Findings of the Study | 5.0% | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. | A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented for each article. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with relevant details and extensive explanation. | 5.64/6.00 | ||
| Recommendations of the Researcher | 5.0% | Researcher recommendations are omitted for one or more of the articles. The recommendations described for three or more articles are inaccurate or incomplete. | Researcher recommendations are indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations described for two of the articles are inaccurate or incomplete. | Researcher recommendations for each article are presented. Researcher recommendations described for one article are inaccurate or incomplete. | Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. | Researcher recommendations accurate are thoroughly described for each article. | 4.98/6.00 | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | 12.00/12.00 | ||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 10.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | 12.00/12.00 | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% | 114.18/120.0 |
,
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| NRS-433V | NRS-433V-O501 | Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations | 200.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) | 4: Good (94.00%) | : Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 75.0% | ||||||||
| Quantitative Studies | 5.0% | Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use quantitative research. | Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on quantitative research. | N/A | N/A | Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research. | 10.00/10.00 | ||
| Background of Study | 10.0% | Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. | Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. | Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. | Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. | Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. | 20.00/20.00 | ||
| Article Support of Nursing Practice | 15.0% | Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. | A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail is required. | A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. | A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. | A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. | 30.00/30.00 | ||
| Method of Study | 15.0% | Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. | A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. | A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. | A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. | A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. | 30.00/30.00 | ||
| Results of Study | 15.0% | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. | A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. | 30.00/30.00 | ||
| Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes Comparison | 15.0% | Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are omitted or are unrealistic. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is incomplete. | Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are partially summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes contains omissions of key information. It is unclear how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare. | Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is generally presented. More information is needed to fully establish how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare. | Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are discussed. A comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity. | Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are thoroughly discussed. A detailed comparison of research article outcomes to the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented in detail. | 30.00/30.00 | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 15.0% | ||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | 10.00/10.00 | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | 10.00/10.00 | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | 10.00/10.00 | ||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | 8.30/10.00 | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | 10.00/10.00 | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% | 198.30/200.0 |
,
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| NRS-433V | NRS-433V-O501 | Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft | 300.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) | 4: Good (94.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 60.0% | |||||||
| Evidence of Revision | 10.0% | Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. | Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. | Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. | Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. | Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed. | ||
| Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question | 5.0% | A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included. | PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. | PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources. | PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources. | PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources. | ||
| Background of Studies | 5.0% | Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. | Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. | Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. | Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. | Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. | ||
| Method of Studies | 5.0% | Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete. | Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. | ||
| Results of Studies | 5.0% | Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. | Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. | ||
| Ethical Considerations | 5.0% | Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete. | Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. | Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. | ||
| Conclusion | 5.0% | Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. | Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. | Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. | Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. | Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. | ||
| PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship | 10.0% | Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included. | Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect. | Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. | Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation. | Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation. | ||
| Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change | 10.0% | The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included. | The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect. | The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details. | The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details. | The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details. | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 30.0% | |||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 10.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 10.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline. Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax. 
About WridemyWe are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers. How It WorksTo make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline. Are there Discounts?All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure. Hire a tutor today CLICK HERE to make your first orderRelated TagsAcademic APA Writing College Course Discussion Management English Finance General Graduate History Information Justify Literature MLA |