CHE 329 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Overview Older adults from the baby boomer generation now account for over one-fifth of the U.S. population. Many chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, stroke, chronic respiratory diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes are the leading causes of death among older adults. With the shift from infectious diseases to chronic disease and degenerative illnesses, is the nation ready to assist older adults in living long and healthy lives? In this course, you have gleaned skills and techniques in analyzing public health policies and communicating social justice issues when assisting the aging population.

For your final project, imagine you are working with a group of older adults facing a public health policy issue. You have been asked to advocate on behalf of this group by developing a policy brief to present to a representative of your state or a state with which you are familiar. You will need to identify the public health issue with the assistance of your population. Your next step would be to compose a public health policy brief explaining the purpose and significance of the public health policy issue and provide recommendations to a policy maker with potential solutions.

The project is divided into three milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules One, Three, and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.

This assessment addresses the following course outcomes:

 Articulate relevant public health interests that reflect the social demographics of the aging population to elicit buy-in from policy makers  Analyze the benefits and limitations of public health policies and programs for determining how they impact the health of the aging population  Analyze social justice issues faced by particular aging populations for determining the factors impacting their well-being  Analyze competing perspectives on policies and programs for developing balanced recommendations to promote the well-being of aging populations

Prompt Compose a 6- to 10-page policy brief addressed to a local policy maker regarding the public health issue you are advocating attention for on behalf of your selected population. Ensure that you use concise language and maintain a tight professional composition to elicit buy-in from the policy maker. Use 5 to 10 credible resources in your brief to support your claims.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Background: In this section, you will concisely introduce your public health need, the affected aging population, and your policy of focus to the policy maker. Your background should be tightly composed to effectively address this professional audience.

A. Articulate to the policy maker a cogent argument regarding a public health interest (or need) of the aging population of your particular state. Be sure to support your argument with relevant health statistics.

B. Provide a profile from this aging population that personalizes the public health interest for the policy maker. For example, for populations that experienced World War II, one might discuss the impact of the war on the mental health status of an individual from that population.

C. Analyze the benefits of the policy for the aging population of your particular state. Be sure to provide specific examples.

II. Limitations of Policy: In this section, you will explore the limitations of the policy in terms of how it influences the health of the aging population and how it relates to social justice factors in the lives of the aging population.

A. Analyze the limitations of the policy for the aging population of your particular state. Be sure to provide specific examples from the policy. B. Based on your analysis, how does the policy impact the health of the aging population of your particular state? Be sure to support your

response with evidence. C. Explain how the limitations of the policy are especially relevant to the social demographic of the aging population in your state. Be sure to

support your response with specific examples. D. Analyze a social justice issue faced by the aging population in your particular state to determine the factors impacting the population. For

example, you might examine issues relating to ageism in the workplace, employer pensions, workplace conditions, racial discrimination, and so on.

E. Explain the impacts of a social justice factor on the well-being of the aging population in your particular state. Support with relevant research. For example, how would social security and healthcare reform impact the way the baby boomer generation votes in the next election?

F. Relate the social justice factor you identified to limitations of the policy. For example, how would exhaustion of social security funds relate to an African American male who is on a limited budget—how would this affect him?

III. Recommendations: In this section, you will examine competing perspectives on the policy you have selected. Using that unbiased lens, you will provide measured recommendations to the policy maker to improve the health of your selected population.

A. Identify a competing perspective on the policy of your state, explaining the rationale of their position and its merits. B. Where do you disagree with the competing perspective you have selected and why? Be sure to include appropriate resources in support of your

argument. C. Based on your analysis, provide balanced recommendations to the policy maker with respect to the policy that promotes the well-being of the

aging population. Be sure to include specific examples of what should be modified.

Milestones Milestone One: Topic Selection In Module One, you will identify an aging-policy issue to explore for your final project. These issues are as diverse as the older adult population and can be tailored to your personal interests. Older Americans are increasingly diverse, differing in their racial and ethnic backgrounds, religion, income, education, and sexual orientation, among other facets. These demographics undeniably impact the development of aging policies, just as different older adults are impacted differently by policies. Instructor feedback on this milestone should be incorporated into your next milestone and into the final project. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.

Milestone Two: Policy Analysis In Module Three, you will build on the introductory information you detailed in Milestone One to begin to analyze your selected policy issue. Instructor feedback on this milestone should be incorporated into your next milestone and into the final project. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.

Milestone Three: Recommendations In Module Five, you will formulate recommendations based on the work you have done so far in analyzing your policy issue. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.

Final Submission: Public Health Policy Brief In Module Seven, you will submit your final public health policy brief. It should explain the purpose and significance of the public health policy issue you have been exploring and provide recommendations to a policy maker with potential solutions. Instructor feedback on the previous milestones should be incorporated into this final submission. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.

Deliverables

Milestone Deliverable Module Due Grading

One Topic Selection One Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric

Two Policy Analysis Three Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric

Three Recommendations Five Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric

Final Submission: Public Health Policy Brief Seven Graded separately; Final Project Rubric

Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your public health policy brief should adhere to the following formatting requirements: 6 to 10 pages, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and the latest edition of the APA manual for formatting and citations. Use 5 to 10 credible resources in your brief.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Background: Public Health Interest [CHE-329-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows an astute ability to appropriately articulate public health interests of the aging population

Articulates to the policy maker a cogent argument regarding a public health interest of the aging population of a particular state and provides relevant health statistics supporting the need

Articulates to the policy maker an argument regarding a public health interest of the aging population of a particular state but argument is not cogent or contains gaps in support

Does not articulate to the policy maker an argument regarding a public health interest of the aging population of a particular state

8

Background: Profile [CHE-329-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and profile is especially well- articulated to personalize the public health interest of the aging population

Provides a profile from a particular aging population that personalizes the public health interest for the policy maker

Provides a profile from a particular aging population but profile provided is not relevant for personalizing the public health interest for the policy maker or contains inaccuracies

Does not provide a profile from a particular aging population

8

Background: Benefits of Policy

[CHE-329-02]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows a complex grasp on the benefits of the policy for the aging population

Analyzes the benefits of the policy for the aging population of a particular state

Analyzes the benefits of the policy for the aging population of a particular state but analysis is cursory or contains inaccuracies

Does not analyze the benefits of the policy for the aging population of a particular state

8

Limitations of Policy: Analyze the Limitations

[CHE-329-02]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows a complex grasp on the limitations of the policy for the aging population

Analyzes limitations of the policy for the aging population of a particular state, providing specific examples from policy

Analyzes limitations of the policy for the aging population of a particular state, but analysis is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or is lacking specific examples from policy

Does not analyze limitations of the policy for the aging population of a particular state

8

Limitations of Policy: Impact the Health of the Aging Population

[CHE-329-02]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows a complex grasp on the policy as it relates to the health of the aging population

Determines how the policy impacts the health of the aging population of a particular state based on analysis, providing supporting evidence

Determines how the policy impacts the health of the aging population of a particular state based on analysis but determination contains inaccuracies or is lacking supporting evidence

Does not determine how the policy impacts the health of the aging population of a particular state based on analysis

8

Limitations of Policy: Relevant to the Social

Demographic [CHE-329-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows keen insight into the relevance of policy limitations to aging populations of particular demographics

Explains how the limitations of the policy are especially relevant to the social demographic based on its public health interest, providing specific examples

Explains how the limitations of the policy are especially relevant to the social demographic based on its public health interest but with gaps in logic or support

Does not explain the limitations of the policy or how they are especially relevant to the social demographic

8

Limitations of Policy: Social Justice Issue

[CHE-329-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows an astute ability to communicate social justice factors affecting particular aging populations

Analyzes a social justice issue faced by the aging population in a particular state to determine the factors impacting the population

Analyzes a social justice issue faced by the aging population in a particular state to determine the factors impacting the population but analysis or determination is cursory or contains inaccuracies

Does not analyze a social justice issue faced by the aging population in a particular state to determine the factors impacting the population

8

Limitations of Policy: Impacts of Social Justice Factor on

Well-Being [CHE-329-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows an astute ability to communicate the impacts of social justice factors on the well-being of the aging population

Explains the impacts of a social justice factor on the well-being of the aging population of a particular state, providing relevant research

Explains the impacts of a social justice factor on the well-being of the aging population of particular state but with gaps in accuracy or support

Does not explain the impacts of a social justice factor on the well-being of the aging population of a particular state

8

Limitations of Policy: Relate to Limitations

[CHE-329-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws nuanced connections between social justice factors and limitations of policies

Relates social justice factor to the limitations of the policy

Relates social justice factor to the limitations of the policy but with gaps in logic or detail

Does not relate social justice factor to the limitations of the policy

8

Recommendations: Competing

Perspectives [CHE-329-04]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows sophisticated awareness of a competing perspective on a particular policy

Identifies competing perspective on the state policy, explaining the rationale of the position and its merits

Identifies competing perspective on the state policy, explaining the rationale of the position and its merits but with gaps in accuracy or clarity

Does not identify competing perspective on the state policy and explain the rationale of the position and its merits

8

Recommendations: Disagree

[CHE-329-04]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and support is especially well-suited to claims against competing perspective on policy

Explains disagreement with competing perspective, providing relevant support

Explains disagreement with competing perspective but with gaps in logic or relevant support

Does not explain disagreement with competing perspective

8

Recommendations: Recommendations

[CHE-329-04]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows an astute ability to develop balanced recommendations for policy makers that promote the well- being of the aging population

Provides balanced recommendations to the policy maker based on analysis to promote the well-being of the aging population, providing relevant support

Provides recommendations to the policy maker, but recommendations are not balanced based on analysis, do not promote the well-being of the aging population, or do not include relevant support

Does not provide recommendations to the policy maker

8

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

4

Total 100%

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Related Tags

Academic APA Writing College Course Discussion Management English Finance General Graduate History Information Justify Literature MLA