Chat with us, powered by LiveChat My topic is Internet Protection Laws: Deepfake Technology Protection Policy In this assignment you will need to look at the Neg outline template and write information using my work t | Wridemy

My topic is Internet Protection Laws: Deepfake Technology Protection Policy In this assignment you will need to look at the Neg outline template and write information using my work t

My topic is Internet Protection Laws: Deepfake Technology Protection Policy

In this assignment you will need to look at the Neg outline template and write information using my work that I have left in the files.

 You  also need to use online sources to find information. I will attach the speech template and I will also attach another students work so you can see what mine will look like.

"Argumentation Brief" is the file that is my work and has information on my topic.

"Negative Manusscript final" is someone else's work but is an example to show you what mine should look like

"1 Aff Maniscript" Is my work and you can use the information that's on it.

"neg outline template" is the file of the template you need to follow.

Internet Protection Laws: Deepfake Technology Protection Policy

Abrahim Ibrahim

California State University Los Angeles

COMM1200

Dr.Grau

3/2/23

Affirmative Argument Negative Counterargument

A. Problem: Deepfake technology cases are

on the rise, and people's lives are being ruined

as a result.

1. Statistics of deepfake technology

a. Deepfake technology usage increased

by 900% between 2018 and 2019,

A. Deepfake technology is challenging to

regulate, and policies that attempt to do so

must be more effective.

1. Those statistics by McAfee show

increased usage, not misuse

a. Deepfake technology's popularity can

be attributed to its numerous advantages

according to a McAfee report (Labs,

2018).

b. According to the same report, more

than 14,000 deepfake videos were

uploaded in 2019, up from 7,964 in

2018.

2. Consequences of deep fake technology

a. As in the case of QTCinderella, deep

fake technology can cause irreversible

damage to a person's reputation,

(Westerlund, 2019). For instance, it is

revolutionizing the film industry.

b. The growing popularity and number

of deepfake videos do not necessarily

indicate that the technology is being

abused. It could instead indicate that

people are becoming more aware of

technology's capabilities and finding

creative and innovative ways to use it

(Westerlund, 2019).

2. QTCinderella fell victim to abuse of

deepfake technology.

a. It is important to acknowledge that

any technology can be used for harmful

purposes. However, we must also

recognize that the potential benefits of

deepfake technology far outweigh the

negative consequences (Kwok & Koh,

2021).

b. Digital watermarking and verification

technologies are being developed to

combat the negative consequences of

career, and personal life (Meskys et

al., 2020).

b. Deep fake technology can also lead to

harassment and intimidation, as seen

in the case of women whose faces

were used in pornographic content

without their consent (Meskys et al.,

2020).

deepfake technology. These safeguards

can aid in the prevention of malicious

use of deepfake technology for

cyberbullying, harassment, and other

harmful purposes (Kwok & Koh, 2021).

References

Chesney, B., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy,

democracy, and national security. Calif. L. Rev., 107, 1753.

Gamage, D., Ghasiya, P., Bonagiri, V., Whiting, M. E., & Sasahara, K. (2022, April). Are

deepfakes concerning? Analyzing conversations of deepfakes on reddit and exploring

societal implications. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors

in Computing Systems (pp. 1-19).

Gieseke, A. P. (2020). " The New Weapon of Choice": Law's Current Inability to Properly

Address Deepfake Pornography. Vand. L. Rev., 73, 1479.

Kwok, A. O., & Koh, S. G. (2021). Deepfake: a social construction of technology

perspective. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(13), 1798-1802.

Labs, M. (2018, November 29). McAfee Labs 2019 Threats Predictions Report | McAfee

Blog. McAfee Blog.

https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/other-blogs/mcafee-labs/mcafee-labs-2019-threats-pre

dictions/

Meskys, E., Kalpokiene, J., Jurcys, P., & Liaudanskas, A. (2020). Regulating deep fakes:

legal and ethical considerations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,

15(1), 24-31.

Westerlund, M. (2019). The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology

innovation management review, 9(11).

,

Student Sample

Negative Manuscript Final

Introduction

Attention Getter: Archibald MacLeish, an American poet, writer, and the Librarian of Congress, once said, Freedom is the right to choose; the right to create for oneself the alternatives of choice. Without the possibility of choice and the exercise of choice a man is not a man but a member, an instrument, a thing.” (www.goodreads.com)

Thesis: Because I agree with Archibald MacLeish, I must negate the argument that the federal government should implement a law which requires everyone to get vaccinated.

Preview: First I will remind you of the affirmative’s argument, then I will explain why I disagree with the argument, and finally I will discuss the costs of the affirmative’s argument.

Transition: First, I will remind you of the affirmative’s argument.

Body

The affirmative noted that the solution to people refusing vaccinations is to implement a law that will require them to be up to date on their vaccinations unless they have a medical exemption.

They argued that both personal beliefs and religious reasons have been used to get exemptions for a long time and that there has been a drop of exemptions in California since personal belief exemptions were removed.

The affirmative also argued that the law they offered as a solution was necessary because vaccines save lives and reduce the chances of spreading disease.

Transition: I disagree that this solution will work for several reasons.

The number of medical exemptions have actually increased since California got rid of personal exemptions for vaccines.

According to Amina Khan from the LA Times on September 5, 2017, “the percentage of California kindergartners with medical exemptions was mostly stable, generally rising only slightly every few years. For example, in 2005 the rate was 0.15%; in 2015 it was 0.17%. But from 2015 to 2016, the medical exemption rate jumped from 0.17% to 0.51% — an unprecedented threefold increase in the rate.” (para. 9-10)

Although a drop in exemptions may have occurred right after the removal of personal-belief exemptions, it seems that a loophole has been found in order to avoid getting vaccinated.

Not only that, but the increase in medical exemptions was mostly centered in areas in California which had previously high rates of personal-belief exemptions.

It has also been found by JAMA Network on September 5, 2017 that because medical exemptions were mostly centered in these areas, parts of California will remain vulnerable to “vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks in the future.” (para. 7)

Moreover, Amina Khan from the LA Times on September 5, 2017 also stated, “The increase in the number of [medical exemptions] granted in 2016 further weakens the immediate effect of SB 277 and may limit its long-term benefits if sustained.” (para. 17)

Therefore, not only are the number of medical exemptions rising, but parts of California are still in danger of contracting dangerous diseases because of it, which means that the rest of California could possibly be put in danger as well. This, then, means that the law wouldn’t be making the change it was intended to make.

Transition: In addition, the costs would outweigh the benefits.

Implementing a law like the one the affirmative has proposed will lead to parents choosing to homeschool their children and unethical doctors, which will only cause further implications.

According to Anita Chabria from The Guardian on August 26, 2015, “With the passage of a new law this summer mandating vaccines for school kids in California, home school advocates and organizations say they are seeing surging interest in off-campus education options that would exempt them from the requirement.” (para. 1)

Lynn Elliot, a parent in northern California, stated that although she thinks it’d be “more beneficial for her daughter to be in public school,” she isn’t willing to take the risk of vaccinating her. (para. 8)

The whole point of a law that requires everyone to get vaccinated is for them to actually get vaccinated, so if parents are choosing to homeschool their children, then those children aren’t getting vaccinated if their parents don’t want them to.

Also, keep in mind that California is one of only three states (out of 50) that doesn’t allow for religious or personal/philosophical belief exemptions from vaccines. If this law were to be implemented, it’s highly probable that many parents in various states will turn to homeschooling in order to avoid vaccinating their children.

Therefore, the number of students in public schools will likely decrease by a large number. Schools get money based on the number of students, so if enrollment is low then schools lose money and if there’s not enough money, then schools will be forced to shut down.

Furthermore, Doctor Bob Sears, a pediatrician who exempted his 2-year-old patient from all childhood vaccines without evidence of a medical issue, wrote on Facebook on June 29, 2018, “Isn’t it my job to listen to my patients and believe what a parent says happened to her baby? Isn’t that what ALL doctors do with their patients?.” (para. 4)

According to Gabrielle Karol from ABC 10 on January 30, 2018, “There are a handful of websites that have published lists of names of California doctors who may be more inclined to sign off on exemptions. Some of these doctors’ websites appear to advertise medical exemptions.” (para. 7)

This goes to show that a law like the one proposed will only force doctors to choose between listening to their patients and lying or following the law and obtaining the proof needed for a medical exemption. Several would rather go off of their patients’ word and lie by signing off on medical exemptions without proof of a medical issue.

But if they would lie about this, what else would they lie about? Whether it be a lie for their patients, or to their patients, there is no telling what these lies can be. This will lead to a mistrust in doctors, and if people don’t trust doctors, they won’t go see them. If people don’t go see them, they won't keep up with their health, which can lead to more sickness and a possible increase in death rates.

So tell me, is a vaccination law really worth losing schools and an increase in sickness and death rates?

Transition: Now that I’ve established the costs, let me conclude.

Conclusion

Review: First I reminded you of the affirmative’s argument, then I explained why I disagree with the argument, and finally I discussed the costs of the affirmative’s argument.

Restate Thesis: Thus, I disagree that implementing a law that requires everyone to be up to date on their vaccinations unless they have a medical exemption is the solution to vaccine refusals.

Closing Thought/Clincher: Wouldn’t you want the freedom to choose what you feel is best for yourself and your family?

Works Cited

“Archibald MacLeish (Author of J.B.).” Goodreads, Goodreads, www.goodreads.com/author/

show/11154.Archibald_MacLeish.

Chabria, Anita. “California Home School Interest Surges as Parents Look to Sidestep Vaccine

Law.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 26 Aug. 2015, www.theguardian.com/

education/2015/aug/26/california-home-school-vaccine-law.

Delamater, Paul L. “Immunization Exemptions After Elimination of Personal Belief Exemptions

in California.” JAMA, American Medical Association, 5 Sept. 2017, jamanetwork.com/

journals/jama/fullarticle/2652640.

Karol, Gabrielle. “Loophole in California Vaccine Law Leads to Rise in Medical Exemptions.”

ABC 10, KXTV, 30 Jan. 2018, www.abc10.com/article/news/local/loophole-in-california-

vaccine-law-leads-to-rise-in-medical-exemptions/103-490980059.

Khan, Amina. “After California Got Rid of Personal Exemptions for Vaccines, Medical

Exemptions Went Way Up.” Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles Times, 5 Sept. 2017,

www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-vaccine-medical-exemptions-20170905-

story.html.

Sears, Bob. Medical Board Case Against Bob Sears. Facebook, 29 June 2018, https://

www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1835023183202824&id=116317855073374&

__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARCvsxV81EWxQUyPunJCzyZXEmfd5-rkS45SN3n_dcREbZz6

xzn1b-VGzS63RZ4_LmxyBAV0iJfqNb6sv7mvHnqnbDp9Yg6M5kjyHR4f8IQw6_Z5QS-

PY0lfj5L7FmQOgfjt7S—gCcXvX6VD0hAP9QJrIKHubf6SeZYlelG1TybYFi-gPRWTELq

la5xJZZfKVy5Lxhigco64RRk1oWjtA5yAqnsdC-82Ebg_wYDym8_mlrQWbdwZW5IFPv7

fBhb5FJcfss7dznqc67we5okTnNEJmPNQyr0D-XMrunGNajKD2N83TIATrAyr6TH3FQ-

ymKyHIhyM-LYF3nM94xOdA&__tn__=K-R

,

Internet Protection Laws: Deepfake Technology Protection Policy

Abrahim Ibrahim

Cal State Los Angeles

Comm 1200

Dr.Grau

3/13/23

Internet Protection Laws: Deepfake Technology Protection Policy

Internet laws, regularly called cyber laws, are a collection of legal regulations and principles that guide different parties on how they will use the internet. Unlike most other laws, internet laws differ from one jurisdiction to the other. Internet law is not also static. Changes in the technology field have made it necessary among parties interested in internet regulation to have left the option of ensuring that they provide the bare minimum requirements that would guide the technology industry rather than having definite positions (Savin, 2020, p.88-128). Internet laws stem from other forms of laws. One of the areas where Internet laws heavily borrow from contract and privacy laws. Like in any other field, several challenges are encountered in implementing internet laws, including the rise of deep fake technology.

Deepfakes use deep learning, a type of artificial intelligence, to make images that resemble actual events, but those events do not exist. There is an emerging concern among experts that deep fakes can be used as tools of misinformation or to spread fake news. In one of the most high-profile deep fakes, in 2018, a deep fake was realized depicting Barack Obama making a public service announcement (Electronica, n.d.). Recently, there has been an increase in the number of instances of deep fake technology. For example, according to the McAfeE report (Labs, 2018), from 2018 to 2019, there was an increase in the number of deep fake technology incidents by 900%. Legally speaking, deep fake technology has been used to invade the rights to privacy and individual reputation. It can also be used as a tool through which various criminal activities can take place. With these statistics, there is a dire need to evaluate the potential causes of the problem and synthesize a solution for the same.

The leading cause of deep fake technology is the use of AI. With the increased use of computer technology and AI there has been a surge in digital criminal activities, and deep fakes are not an exemption. Using deep learning algorithms, computer users have developed software that can effectively swap faces in videos so accurately that other people can't recognize the difference. Persons behind the deepfake videos need to establish a target video and then use auto-encoders to affect the face-swapping. The videos do not need to be related, and they can be randomly picked from the internet. Then the video developer uses the auto-encoders to create a convincing environment to persuade people that they are listening to or watching the acclaimed individual.

There are various ways through which deep fake technology can be controlled. Foremost, using technology-based solutions has proven to be one of the effective ways to control the problem. According to Labs (2018), coming up with deep fake-identification algorithms can help establish a solution to the problem. Blockchain technology and generative adversarial networks have been fronted as some of the best methods which can be used to detect and label deep fake videos. Appropriate legislation can also help in mitigating the problem. There is a need to create a multi-faced legal system that seals all the loopholes in the current internet laws (Savin, 2020). The technology field is faced with continuous changes, and those spearheading legislation on the same should ensure that they undertake appropriate measures to keep the legislative agenda on information technology-based issues open. Consultation on legislations on deep fake technology should be the guiding force of the government before it implements any law. Equally, it remains within the realm of the government that it should implement the laws that are formulated. Lastly, media literacy can also help the public appreciate the need to protect personal space. Policymakers should use the multi-faced approach to solving the problem in relation to deep videos.

References

Electronica. (n.d.). Obama Deep fake. https://ars.electronica.art/center/en/obama-deep-fake/

Labs, M. (2018, November 29). McAfee Labs 2019 Threats Predictions Report | McAfee Blog. McAfee Blog. https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/other-blogs/mcafee-labs/mcafee-labs-2019-threats-pre dictions/

Savin, A. (2020). EU internet law. Edward Elgar Publishing.

,

Student Name:

Outline Template for Neg Speech

1. Introduction

1. Attention-Getter: (labels for these items must

1. Negation: be included in outline)

1. Preview:

Transition:

1. Body

1. Review stock issue attacking (NOT entire Aff speech)

1. Review claim

a. evidence for 1

b. evidence for 1

1. Review evidence

Transition:

1. Claim about why Aff is wrong

1. How/why is Aff wrong/Ill isn’t a problem/Blame is misidentified

1. How/why status quo is right/good/sufficient to solve ill

a . evidence for 2

(1) evidence for a

(2) evidence for a

(a) evidence for (2)

(b) evidence for (2)

b. evidence for 2

Transition:

1. Claim about why the Cure won’t solve Ill

1. What are costs for Aff’s cure

1. Why the solvency is insufficient to warrant plan

1. What is counterplan for cure (only if attacking Aff’s Blame)

Transition:

1. Conclusion

1. Review: (the labels for these main points

1. NEW Thesis: this is the Neg’s claim must be in your final outline)

1. Closing Thought/Clincher:

Works Cited

[List your sources, in alphabetical order, using APA citation style]

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

About Wridemy

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

Hire a tutor today CLICK HERE to make your first order

Related Tags

Academic APA Writing College Course Discussion Management English Finance General Graduate History Information Justify Literature MLA