03 Apr Teachers are often very comfortable with giving specific and measurable feedback to their students. However, when the audience shifts to adults, some new school leaders are often
Teachers are often very comfortable with giving specific and measurable feedback to their students. However, when the audience shifts to adults, some new school leaders are often nervous about providing specific and measurable feedback.
Read the "Developing Professional Capacity" case study to inform the assignment.
Developing professional capacity is a complex process. It requires data collection and analysis, while keeping in mind student achievement as the desired end result. Using your classroom teacher perspective and knowledge of administration leadership, consider the conversations you will have through the evaluation cycle.
Part 1: Case Analysis
In 250-500 words, respond to the case study by addressing the following:
- Brief summary of the case
- Issues to be resolved
- Stakeholders involved in the issues
- One or two existing laws or court rulings that relate to the issues
- District policies that relate to the issues
- Possible solutions to the issues
- Solutions chosen to resolve the issues
- Action steps (2-5) for implementing each solution, including a timeline for each step
- Potential moral and legal consequences of each solution
Part 2: Rationale
Support the case analysis with a 250-500 word rationale explaining the solutions you chose and how each solution:
- Uses data to design plans for developing the instructional capacity of faculty.
- Makes decisions that promote a culture of collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations.
- Evaluates potential moral and legal consequences to make difficult decisions with integrity and fairness.
- Strives to build and sustain positive relationships between school representatives, students, families, and community partners, when their needs conflict.
Cite the case as well as 2-3 scholarly resources.
If possible, share your case analysis with your principal mentor and make revisions based on his or her feedback before submitting with Part 1.
While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and any source documents should be referenced using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric . Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Case Study: Developing Professional Capacity – Rubric
Case Analysis 1-3: Summary, Issues, Stakeholders 3 points
Criteria Description
Case Analysis 1-3: Summary, Issues, Stakeholders
5. Excellent 3 points
Analysis skillfully and convincingly summarizes the case, identifies the issues to be
resolved, and identifies the stakeholders involved in the issues.
4. Good 2.61 points
Analysis accurately summarizes the case, identifies the issues to be resolved, and
identifies the stakeholders involved in the issues.
3. Satisfactory 2.22 points
Analysis minimally summarizes the case, identifies the issues to be resolved, and
identifies the stakeholders involved in the issues.
2. Less than Satisfactory 2.07 points
Analysis inadequately summarizes the case, identifies the issues to be resolved, and
identifies the stakeholders involved in the issues.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Not addressed.
Case Analysis 4-5: Laws and Policies 3 points
Criteria Description
Case Analysis 4-5: Laws and Policies
5. Excellent 3 points
Identifies compelling existing laws or court rulings and district policies related to
the issues.
4. Good 2.61 points
Collapse All
Clearly identifies existing laws or court rulings and district policies related to the
issues.
3. Satisfactory 2.22 points
Vaguely identifies existing laws or court rulings and district policies related to the
issues.
2. Less than Satisfactory 2.07 points
Ineffectively identifies existing laws or court rulings and district policies related to
Case Analysis 6-8: Solutions and Action Steps 6 points
Criteria Description
Case Analysis 6-8: Solutions and Action Steps
5. Excellent 6 points
Identifies exceptional solutions to resolve the issues and insightfully selects ideal
solutions for resolving the issues. Action steps and timeline are thoughtful and
realistic.
4. Good 5.22 points
Identifies logical solutions to resolve the issues and appropriately selects solutions
for resolving the issues. Action steps and timeline are suitable.
3. Satisfactory 4.44 points
Identifies cursory solutions to resolve the issues and selects partially proficient
solutions for resolving the issues. Action steps and timeline are weak.
2. Less than Satisfactory 4.14 points
Identifies incomprehensible solutions to resolve the issues and selects poor
solutions for resolving the issues. Action steps and timeline are irrelevant.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Not addressed.
Case Analysis 9: Consequences 3 points
Criteria Description
Case Analysis 9: Consequences
5. Excellent 3 points
Moral and legal consequences of proposed solutions are thorough and proficiently
explained.
4. Good 2.61 points
Moral and legal consequences of proposed solutions are properly explained.
3. Satisfactory 2.22 points
Moral and legal consequences of proposed solutions are missing key details.
2. Less than Satisfactory 2.07 points
Moral and legal consequences of proposed solutions are incorrectly explained or
incomprehensible.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Rationale 9 points
Criteria Description
Rationale
5. Excellent 9 points
Rationale compellingly explains how the proposed solutions: use data to design
plans for developing the instructional capacity of faculty; make decisions that
promote a culture of collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations; evaluates
potential moral and legal consequences to make difficult decisions with integrity
and fairness; and strive to build and sustain positive relationships between school
representatives, students, families, and community partners, when their needs
conflict.
4. Good 7.83 points
Rationale reasonably explains how the proposed solutions: use data to design plans
for developing the instructional capacity of faculty; make decisions that promote a
culture of collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations; evaluates potential
moral and legal consequences to make difficult decisions with integrity and
fairness; and strive to build and sustain positive relationships between school
representatives, students, families, and community partners, when their needs
conflict.
3. Satisfactory 6.66 points
Rationale inexplicitly explains how the proposed solutions: use data to design plans
for developing the instructional capacity of faculty; make decisions that promote a
culture of collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations; evaluates potential
moral and legal consequences to make difficult decisions with integrity and
fairness; and strive to build and sustain positive relationships between school
representatives, students, families, and community partners, when their needs
conflict.
2. Less than Satisfactory 6.21 points
i l i d l l i h h d l i d d i
Organization 1.5 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Excellent 1.5 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Good 1.31 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
3. Satisfactory 1.11 points
The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience
with a sense of the main idea.
2. Less than Satisfactory 1.04 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Documentation of Sources 1.5 points
Criteria Description
citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style
5. Excellent 1.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good 1.31 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory 1.11 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several
minor formatting errors are present.
2. Less than Satisfactory 1.04 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
Mechanics of Writing 3 points
Criteria Description
includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use
5. Excellent 3 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-
developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are
varied and engaging.
4. Good 2.61 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder
comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some
practice and content-related language.
3. Satisfactory 2.22 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
2. Less than Satisfactory 2.07 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Total 30 points
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Wridemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.