Chat with us, powered by LiveChat For a?manager?to successfully execute a strategy for a product or process innovation, they must have a strategy for the implementation, which requires flexing their skills in?informa | Wridemy

For a?manager?to successfully execute a strategy for a product or process innovation, they must have a strategy for the implementation, which requires flexing their skills in?informa

For a manager to successfully execute a strategy for a product or process innovation, they must have a strategy for the implementation, which requires flexing their skills in information analysis. Understanding the impact of regulatory requirements and the ethical considerations for the rollout are key factors to developing strategies for a successful launch. Each innovation will have its own considerations, such as protecting intellectual property rights, complying with federal regulations and local laws, or issues affecting the community.

This week, you’ll present the implementation strategy for your innovation to the executive leadership team and the project management office (PMO) so they can assign resources and put a project team together.

Assessment Deliverable

Complete a 700- to- 1,225-word implementation strategy for the innovation you selected.

Identify the organizational resources necessary to implement and assess whether the organization has the resources or must hire or contract to get there.

Explain any ethical, legal, and regulatory implications related to the implementation.

  • Identify regulatory stakeholders that may influence the approval and implementation of your innovation.
  • Identify legal mechanisms to protect the innovation through patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.
  • Identify any ethical issues related to the implementation of the innovation.

Establish a timeline for deploying your innovation. Include at least 5 major tasks or milestones that must be accomplished to roll out your innovation. Consider formatting your timeline as a chart.

Cite any references to support 

Format your assessment according to APA guidelines

ENT/527 v3

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

ENT/527 Grading Rubrics Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Financial Performance Review Presentation ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Innovation Evaluation Report ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Innovation Implementation Strategy ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6

Grading Rubrics ENT/527 v3 Page 2 of 7

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Financial Performance Review Presentation

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Competitor Research

Weight: 35%

Research of competitors’ financial performance, including an examination of their business models and strategies used to achieve their business objectives, was comprehensive.

Research of competitors’ financial performance, including an examination of their business models and strategies used to achieve their business objectives, was adequate.

Research of competitors’ financial performance, including an examination of their business models and strategies used to achieve their business objectives, was partially adequate.

Research of competitors’ financial performance, including an examination of their business models and strategies used to achieve their business objectives, was superficial or not evident.

Competitive Analysis

Weight: 35%

The competitive analysis of organizational performance considerations, such as revenue generation, product distribution, customer acquisition, and absolute value, was insightful.

The competitive analysis of organizational performance considerations, such as revenue generation, product distribution, customer acquisition, and absolute value, was sometimes insightful.

The competitive analysis of organizational performance considerations, such as revenue generation, product distribution, customer acquisition, and absolute value, was infrequently insightful.

The competitive analysis of organizational performance considerations, such as revenue generation, product distribution, customer acquisition, and absolute value, was not insightful or not evident.

Application to Your Innovation

Weight: 20%

The evaluation of how the competitive research applies to your innovation and can help with a development strategy was comprehensive.

The evaluation of how the competitive research applies to your innovation and can help with a development strategy was adequate.

The evaluation of how the competitive research applies to your innovation and can help with a development strategy was partially adequate.

The evaluation of how the competitive research applies to your innovation and can help with a development strategy was superficial or not evident.

Grading Rubrics ENT/527 v3 Page 3 of 7

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Digital Fluency: Digital Creation Weight: 5%

Effectively used existing information to create and communicate new content to an appropriate audience

Mostly used existing information to create and communicate new content to an appropriate audience; use of information may not have been fully effective

Partially used existing information to create and communicate new content to an appropriate audience; use of information was partially effective

Did not use existing information to effectively create and communicate new content to an appropriate audience; use of information was ineffective

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content.

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content.

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content.

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible.

Grading Rubrics ENT/527 v3 Page 4 of 7

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Innovation Evaluation Report

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Obstacles to Innovation

Weight: 15%

Identification of the obstacles in adopting the innovation was clear

Identification of the obstacles in adopting the innovation was mostly clear

Identification of the obstacles in adopting the innovation was somewhat clear

Identification of the obstacles in adopting the innovation was unclear or not evident

Mitigating Risks and Leveraging Advantages

Weight: 20%

Explanation of how to mitigate risks and leverage advantages was thorough and highly insightful

Explanation of how to mitigate risks and leverage advantages was adequate and insightful

Explanation of how to mitigate risks and leverage advantages was partially complete and sometimes insightful

Explanation of how to mitigate risks and leverage advantages was limited and not insightful, or it was not evident

Project Champions

Weight: 20%

Explanation of how identified project champions would maximize benefits and minimize risks was comprehensive

Explanation of how identified project champions would maximize benefits and minimize risks was adequate

Explanation of how identified project champions would maximize benefits and minimize risks was partially adequate

Explanation of how identified project champions would maximize benefits and minimize risks was inadequate or not evident

Sequential or Parallel Processes

Weight: 10%

Explanation of the considerations for using mostly sequential or parallel processes was comprehensive

Explanation of the considerations for using mostly sequential or parallel processes was adequate

Explanation of the considerations for using mostly sequential or parallel processes was partially adequate

Explanation of the considerations for using mostly sequential or parallel processes was inadequate or not evident

Stage-Gate Process

Weight: 10%

Explanation of the influence of stage-gate process on development time and costs was comprehensive

Explanation of the influence of stage-gate process on development time and costs was adequate

Explanation of the influence of stage-gate process on development time and costs was partially adequate

Explanation of the influence of stage-gate process on development time and costs was inadequate or not evident

Grading Rubrics ENT/527 v3 Page 5 of 7

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Weight: 15%

Cost-benefit analysis of the development process was thorough and highly insightful

Cost-benefit analysis of the development process was adequate and insightful

Cost-benefit analysis of the development process was partially complete and sometimes insightful

Cost-benefit analysis of the development process was limited and not insightful, or it was not evident

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Make Judgements/Draw Conclusions Weight: 5%

Fully formed judgement to arrive at a conclusion; identified and recommended the best solution

Mostly formed judgements to arrive at a conclusion; identified and recommended an acceptable solution

Partially formed judgement to arrive at a conclusion; identified and recommended a less favorable solution

Did not form or illogically formed judgement to arrive at a conclusion; identified and recommended an impractical solution

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content.

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content.

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content.

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible.

Grading Rubrics ENT/527 v3 Page 6 of 7

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Innovation Implementation Strategy

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Resources Needed

Weight: 25%

Identification of the organizational resources needed for implementation, whether internal or external, was thorough and highly insightful

Identification of the organizational resources needed for implementation, whether internal or external, was adequate and insightful

Identification of the organizational resources needed for implementation, whether internal or external, was partially complete and sometimes insightful

Identification of the organizational resources needed for implementation, whether internal or external, was inadequate and not insightful, or it was not evident

Regulatory

Weight: 15%

Explanation of the regulatory stakeholders and their influence on the implementation was comprehensive

Explanation of the regulatory stakeholders and their influence on the implementation was adequate

Explanation of the regulatory stakeholders and their influence on the implementation was partially adequate

Explanation of the regulatory stakeholders and their influence on the implementation was inadequate or not evident

Legal

Weight: 15%

Explanation of the legal mechanisms needed to protect the innovation, whether through patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, was comprehensive

Explanation of the legal mechanisms needed to protect the innovation, whether through patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, was adequate

Explanation of the legal mechanisms needed to protect the innovation, whether through patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, was partially adequate

Explanation of the legal mechanisms needed to protect the innovation, whether through patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, was inadequate or not evident

Ethics

Weight: 15%

Explanation of the ethical issues related to the implementation was comprehensive

Explanation of the ethical issues related to the implementation was adequate

Explanation of the ethical issues related to the implementation was partially adequate

Explanation of the ethical issues related to the implementation was inadequate or not evident

Grading Rubrics ENT/527 v3 Page 7 of 7

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A 

Proficient 74-89% C to B+

Developing  60-73% D to C-

Needs Improvement 0-59%

F

Timeline

Weight: 20%

The timeline for deployment of the innovation, including tasks or milestones, was thorough and highly insightful.

The timeline for deployment of the innovation, including tasks or milestones, was adequate and insightful.

The timeline for deployment of the innovation, including tasks or milestones, was partially complete and sometimes insightful.

The timeline for deployment of the innovation, including tasks or milestones, was inadequate and not insightful, or it was not evident.

Cultural Competence and Ethics: Respectful Communication and Interaction

Weight: 5%

Strongly engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural settings; inclusively acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities

Sufficiently engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural settings; adequately acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities

Insufficiently engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural settings; narrowly acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities

Did not engage in transparent conversations or respond ethically in professional intercultural settings; inappropriately acknowledged or did not acknowledge the value of others within diverse communities

APA, Grammar, and Writing Mechanics Weight: 5%

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; when applicable, attention to APA citation and formatting enhanced the content.

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting did not detract from the content.

Occasional inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA citation and formatting detracted from the content.

Frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice; when applicable, APA formatting made the content inaccessible.

  • ENT/527 Grading Rubrics
    • Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Financial Performance Review Presentation
    • Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Innovation Evaluation Report
    • Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Innovation Implementation Strategy

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

About Wridemy

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

Hire a tutor today CLICK HERE to make your first order

Related Tags

Academic APA Writing College Course Discussion Management English Finance General Graduate History Information Justify Literature MLA