Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Outline of Literature Review Post a rough outline, (bullet and/or short narrative) of your literature review in order to obtain feedback from your colleagues regarding an | Wridemy

Outline of Literature Review Post a rough outline, (bullet and/or short narrative) of your literature review in order to obtain feedback from your colleagues regarding an

Discussion Thread: Outline of Literature Review

Post a rough outline, (bullet and/or short narrative) of your literature review in order to obtain feedback from your colleagues regarding any sections of the literature you may not have thought of. Be sure to cover the salient points of the literature review (do not include the conceptualization part of the Conflict Resolution: Part 2 – Literature Review and Conceptualization Assignment). Base this discussion upon the Conflict Resolution: Part 2 – Literature Review and Conceptualization Assignment.   

Literature and Conceptualization Assignment will consist of a thorough review of the literature pertaining to the identified conflict as well as the theoretical orientation you have chosen to conceptualize the conflict dynamic.  

You will post one thread of at least 500 words which include Bible perspectives. 

You must support their assertions with at least 3 scholarly citations in the current APA format. 

Due by 10a.m Saturday September 2, 2023. NO LATE WORK!!!!

PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENTS!

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 50 to >45 pts

Advanced

Includes accurate identification of each articles premise, significant points in support of the premise

45 to >41 pts

Proficient

Includes accurate identification of each articles premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, but one or more of them need improvement

41 to >0 pts

Developing

One of the following is missing or insufficiently analytical: accurate identification of each articles premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise

0 pts

Not Present

50 pts

Content 50 to >45 pts

Advanced

The review contains an accurate, detailed, and well thought out comparison of the salient points of the journal articles

45 to >41 pts

Proficient

The review contains comparisons of the salient points of the journal articles. The detail and critical thinking intersection is less defined

41 to >0 pts

Developing

The review vaguely links the salient points of the articles and is generally lacking in critical analysis

0 pts

Not Present

50 pts

Content 54 to >49 pts

Advanced

Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s informed and substantiated opinion, thorough evaluation of the article’s premise, and supporting points. Conceptualization of the theoretical orientation to be used by the student is abundantly clear and grounded.

49 to >44 pts

Proficient

Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s opinion and some evaluation of the article’s premise and/or arguments but overlooks some points. Additionally, conceptualization of the theoretical orientation to be used by the student is generally clear and grounded.

44 to >0 pts

Developing

Student’s opinion of the article is stated, along with critical evaluation of the article’s premise and/or argument, but some significant points are overlooked. Additionally, conceptualization of the theoretical orientation to be used by the student is vague with little grounding.

0 pts

Not Present

54 pts

Conflict Resolution: Part 2 – Literature and Conceptualization Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure 22 to >19 pts

Advanced

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. Student has proper page count. Twelve to fourteen pages (or more if page count waived by instructor) not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

19 to >17 pts

Proficient

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. Student has 70% of the proper page count of twelve pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

17 to >0 pts

Developing

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. Student has less than 70% of the proper page count of twelve pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

0 pts

Not Present

22 pts

Structure 22 to >19 pts

Advanced

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are correctly formatted. Paper is double spaced with 1 to inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

19 to >17 pts

Proficient

Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are present with few errors. Paper is double spaced with 1 to inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

17 to >0 pts

Developing

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are included though several errors are present. Paper is double spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 pts

Not Present

22 pts

Conflict Resolution: Part 2 – Literature and Conceptualization Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure 22 to >19 pts

Advanced

Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 20 citations as listed below. Research may incorporate multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.

Standard: • A minimum of 20 citations: 12 recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 20 citations.

19 to >17 pts

Proficient

Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 70% of the required 20 citations as listed below. Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.

Standard: • A minimum of 20 citations: 12 recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 20 citations.

17 to >0 pts

Developing

1 to 18 Points: Less than 70% of the Academic sources required 20 citations as listed below are used. Reliance on popular sources is evident. Arguments incorporate limited research but often include personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. Research is not aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate reference section is provided.

Standard: • A minimum of 20 citations: 12 recent (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. However, professional journals (no more than 50%) and .gov references may be used for this requirement. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 20 citations.

0 pts

Not Present

22 pts

Total Points: 220

Conflict Resolution: Part 2 – Literature and Conceptualization Grading Rubric | CJUS830_B02_202340

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

About Wridemy

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

Hire a tutor today CLICK HERE to make your first order

Related Tags

Academic APA Writing College Course Discussion Management English Finance General Graduate History Information Justify Literature MLA