Criteria

Point Values

Details

Content Knowledge

Assessing the depth and accuracy of the group's understanding of the subject matter.

– Excellent

4

Thorough understanding demonstrated with comprehensive and accurate knowledge.

– Good

3

Solid understanding demonstrated with mostly accurate and well-presented information.

– Fair

2

Adequate understanding demonstrated with some inaccuracies or gaps in knowledge.

– Poor

1

Limited understanding demonstrated with significant inaccuracies or misunderstandings.

Visual Aid (Poster Board)

Evaluating the quality and effectiveness of the visual aid (poster board) presentation.

– Excellent

4

Visual aid is well-designed, organized, visually appealing, and enhances understanding.

– Good

3

Visual aid is clear, organized, and supports the content effectively.

– Fair

2

Visual aid is somewhat disorganized or lacks clarity in supporting the content.

– Poor

1

Visual aid is poorly designed, cluttered, or does not effectively support the content.

Peer-Reviewed References

Assessing the use of high-quality peer-reviewed references in the group's project.

– Excellent

4

Three or more peer-reviewed references are used appropriately and cited accurately.

– Good

3

Two or three peer-reviewed references are used effectively and cited correctly.

– Fair

2

One or two peer-reviewed references are used, but there may be some issues with citation.

– Poor

1

Limited or no use of peer-reviewed references, or significant issues with citation accuracy.

Presentation Skills

Evaluating the group's oral presentation skills, including clarity, organization, and delivery.

– Excellent

4

Presentation is clear, engaging, well-structured, and delivered with confidence and clarity.

– Good

3

Presentation is mostly clear, organized, and delivered with sufficient confidence and clarity.

– Fair

2

Presentation has some clarity and organization issues, and delivery may lack confidence.

– Poor

1

Presentation is unclear, disorganized, and lacks confidence and clarity in delivery.

Collaboration and Teamwork

Assessing the group's ability to collaborate effectively, communicate, and work as a team.

– Excellent

4

Strong collaboration and teamwork demonstrated, with effective communication and synergy.

– Good

3

Good collaboration and teamwork demonstrated, with effective communication and cooperation.

– Fair

2

Adequate collaboration and teamwork demonstrated, but with some communication or cooperation issues.

– Poor

1

Limited collaboration and teamwork, with significant communication or cooperation issues.

Overall Quality

Overall assessment of the project's quality, including content, visual aid, presentation, and teamwork.

– Excellent

4

Outstanding quality demonstrated across all criteria, with a cohesive and impressive project.

– Good

3

Good quality demonstrated overall, with strong performance in most criteria.

– Fair

2

Adequate quality demonstrated overall, with some areas needing improvement.

– Poor

1

Poor quality demonstrated overall, with significant deficiencies in multiple areas.